Memo
4 19 Clements which appears to dispose of the possible danger. The Memo remarks that the royalty has been married, some 3 years ago on the ground that the wife & opium were with him, though we have read no other note on that.
In sec 57(4) this alteration has been made. In view of the explanations given by the Element, I don't think it is necessary or desirable to alter the royalty on morphine from $10.
Tel. ape #BL is quite competent. It doesn't like to go back to the old figure $30 per.
There is nothing else in the order to which exception need be taken.
? Sanchos 27. & want to send copy of 3524 to show that the Brit & colonies may be furnished.
JR $11. I regret to have delayed this so long; but in the absence of any assistance from.
The Exam was making the riding allowance. (1300), WL 20,021-23, 60939. 11/09. A.& E.W. (12,528).,, 11,407-17. 7/09.
The Itk. atty Sen? Took some JR $5/1 tent to double, I think 483.
This has been delayed by pressure of other work, and I have been delayed considerably but for Mr Robinson's labours which have lightened mine.
Shar how bren Koroneygh the order and concurs generally in his observations.
I do not think there are present any great points arising from consolidation.
Wr au his work 8.6.R.11/12.
I am much indebted to Robinson for it is most regrettable that upon this later stage have the burden imposed upon.
If the incompetence of Sir H. Berkeley at a time when the departmental work was particularly heavy. We have taken due notice of this neglect.
the draft the Liqueur more need say no more.
Ans & morphine satisfied if d o sad ful w. knew exactly what restrictions it is proposed to impose upon on the sale of the Drug (up to paragraph 35248).
I think we might send copy of 357248 to desents.
I think we might send it to B. J?
Page information is not explicitly present in the given text, hence not added.
a
memo
4 19 Clements which appeas
to dispore of the possible danger. The
M
for tremo remarks that the royaltyg
a opu
Las been maried, som 3 Affer on the ground
that the frite & opain with sire
though we have read no other notre
I'm that
in sec 57(4) this alteration has been made
In view of the explanations pin by MElement
I't think it is necessary or bevalle
to alter the royalty
an
morphine pon $10
tel
ape #BL
eis quite competent
It doesnt like
to the old figure $30 per
There is nothing else in the order to weiche
exception need be taken.
? Sanchos 27.
&
wate to 20. sendry way of 3524)
wack that the bit & counties may be
purnished.
Jam
JR $11.
to have delayed the so long; hat in the
absence & any aroistance
from
The wxam
ng the ridin
ance.
(1300), WL 20,021-23, 60939. 11/09. A.& E.W. (12,528).,, 11,407-17.
7/09.
The Itk. atty Sen?
Took some
JR $5/1
tent
r to ouble, I thanke
483
This has been delayed by peame of other work,
and 25? have been delayed conces but for
Me Robinson's labours which hav
lic untered mine.
Shar
how
bren Koroneygh the order and concus
Generally in his obsáro
༄
I do not think
are presets heydt points arise
consolidation
Wr
au
his work
8.6.R.11/12
the
much indebted thus Robinson for it is most regrettable that
ира this later seid have the imposed upon
にする。
ら
x
kin
If the incompetence of Sir H. Berkeley
at a time when the departmental work
particularly heavy. We have havavar
this neglect
taken due notice of
the draft
the Liqueur more
need soy no mae.
Ans
ང་
& morpleine
satisfind if
d
o sad ful
w. knew exarty
what restrictions it is proposed
to impose auf on the sale of thre Drug (up peunthinaete para of eucht to 35248) * ģ slid ook exactly what is going to be done
Parra
caism.
3
send copy
copy of
357248
desents
I think we might
it & B. J?&
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.